Judging Criteria

A transparent, merit-based scoring system designed to recognize true excellence

Our Evaluation Framework

Every nomination is evaluated using a standardised framework that ensures fairness, consistency, and transparency. A minimum of 5 jury members score each submission independently across five weighted criteria. Total possible score: 100 points.

80
Winning Threshold: 80/100 points minimumCategories with no entries reaching 80 points will have no winner that year. This ensures the award maintains its prestige and high standards.
Five Areas

Evaluation Criteria

30%

Technical Skill / Execution

Evaluates the level of technical proficiency, precision, and artistic expression demonstrated in the submitted work.

Mastery of techniques and tools
Precision and attention to detail
Artistic vision and creative expression
Consistency and quality of execution
25%

Creativity / Innovation

Assesses originality, innovative approaches, and the ability to push boundaries within the relevant field.

Originality of concepts and approach
Creative problem-solving
Trend-setting or trendsetting potential
Unique perspective or methodology
20%

Professional Presentation

Evaluates the quality of professional presentation, branding, portfolio documentation, and overall visual standards.

Portfolio documentation quality
Professional branding and self-presentation
Clarity and quality of visual materials
Attention to presentation detail
15%

Industry Impact

Measures the tangible outcomes and real-world impact of the nominee's work on clients, the business, the community, or the industry at large.

Measurable business or client outcomes
Client satisfaction and feedback
Industry influence and reach
Community or educational impact
10%

Consistency / Portfolio Quality

Evaluates the depth, breadth, and consistency of the nominee's body of work and the overall quality of the submitted portfolio.

Breadth and depth of portfolio
Consistency across multiple projects
Range of skills demonstrated
Quality of documentation and evidence
10-Point System

Scoring Scale

Score
Level
Description
9-10
Outstanding
Exceptional achievement setting new standards. Demonstrates mastery at the highest level.
7-8
Excellent
Significantly above average. Demonstrates clear expertise and notable achievements.
5-6
Good
Meets professional standards with some distinguishing qualities. Solid, competent work.
3-4
Satisfactory
Meets basic requirements but lacks standout features or demonstrable impact.
1-2
Below Standard
Does not meet the minimum criteria or insufficient evidence provided.
Category-Specific

Example Rubrics

While the five core criteria apply to all categories, specific evaluation focus areas are adapted to each specialization

✂

Hair Specialists

  • Cut precision and symmetry
  • Colour accuracy and vibrancy
  • Styling creativity and wearability
  • Before/after transformation quality
  • Client-appropriateness of results
💄

Makeup Artists

  • Skin preparation and base application
  • Colour theory and palette selection
  • Blending and technique
  • Suitability for context (bridal, editorial, etc.)
  • Photographic quality of the result
🏢

Business & Salons

  • Revenue growth or client retention metrics
  • Innovation in service delivery
  • Team development and culture
  • Client experience and satisfaction
  • Sustainability or social responsibility

See the Full Process

Learn how our jury applies these criteria through the complete judging process

Judging ProcessNominate Now